I'm sure this has probably been brought up before (but I didn't fancy searching through hundreds of posts), but can anyone explain why so many couple's profiles only have pics of the female?
I understand that discretion is a big part of this site for a lot of people, but at the end of the day if we were to play with another couple, we would want to know what everyone involved in meeting up would look like. Even in some private galleries there are often just pics of the females so only half of the story is being told...
Haha! Tell him to stop being such a girl!
We're mainly here for myself (female) as well, but even though I have no desire to play with the male half of couples, I still have to find them desirable.. I believe honesty is the best policy and saves alot of time and disappointment.. I know discretion is very important, but faces can be cropped and distinguishing body features photo-shopped out (I personally have a very distinct tatoo and a few moles I edit from all my photos for this reason).
We, like most of the other posters here, have pics of both of us, together and solo, in our Public and Private Gallery.
We, like most of the other posters here, have been 'sucked in' by profiles with spanking hot bi chicks hiding behind partners who've let themselves go (some to the point, you could almost swear it was her dad!).
Some experiences we've had so far..
When we first joined (all of 2mths ago), we had a (verified) couple initiate contact with us - Heaps of hot pics of her in the Public Gallery (no face shots though), but when asked for their PG, they managed to keep "accidently" forgetting to unlock it for us (like, really? Is it that hard to check a box?). I was in contact with her via SMS and she kept pushing a meeting, which I kept putting off while politely asking for PG access/face pics. Eventually, I received a few face shots of her in a MMS, but still iterated we needed to see both halves of the couple before setting up a meeting. After realising I wasn't willing to bend on the matter, they stopped contacting us.. She either thought I was after her man, or he was a horror! :D
On the other hand, another (verified) couple flirted us recently (the only public pic was an arse shot of her), we replied via message with our PG attached, and got theirs back, only to find it filled with cock shots and sleazy photos of him smoking and drinking pre-mix bourbon.. Needless to say, they were not on the top of my to-do list!
A couple we met at a RHP event, I'd originally over-looked because there were no pics of him in their Pubilc Gallery, and was trying to save myself the effort of typing out a "Thanks, but no thanks".. Turns out he's quite fine!
The only couple we've met directly from RHP had both the male and female in their profile photo.
The synopsis?
RHP boys need to starting being brave and baring their smexy bodies for us! :P
Go on girls, strip him down, get him all hot , bothered and oiled up and show off your sexy man!! (Or work out where the timer is on your camera and have some fun with him! Me and my boy love our photoshoot shags :D )
.....is when a female profile is for a couple. You read through the profile and eventually get to the part that says that 'she'is searching for a girl to share with her partner.
Now please don't think me hypocritical as I too have listed that I prefer my hubby present when I'm playing with couples. My primary purpose for opening a profile on RHP was to find other bisexua ladiesl and/or lesbians to play with one on one. The ladies I'm complaining about are the ones who have no intention of ever playing without their partner. For heaven's sake, please take out a couple's profile.
As for the absent males in the galleries of couples profiles, you can always ask for a piccie to be emailed. Hubby and I met with a couple who were not showing him in the profile because he felt vulnerable because of his work but he was a nice looking man and we had fun. I guess some people have their reasons for keeping their images private until further along in the proceedings.
That is, we get why some people are very shy about having their pictures in profiles if there is some very sensitive issue to do with their particular employment. But that does not explain why there can't be at least a tastefull body shot in the public gallery with any particularly identifying features obscured. Something that at least gives you some measure of whether they have any physical characteristics that you are going to find either attractive or repulsive according to your personal tastes before you go too far into the process.
We all know that personality is the final measure with attraction, but it takes a pretty outstanding personality to get you past the gnarly looking 16 stone bloke with only a couple of teeth and where the only six pack he has ever heard of are the ones of EB he is holding under each arm (yes its an extreme example, but you know what we mean).
In our case Mrs definitely wants to know that she is not in for a meet where she is going to have to turn down in person someone with who she was never likely to have a basic starting point for physical attraction in the first place. So regardless of how they are provided we just will not agree to meet anyone unless we have had pictures first as part of the initial online interview process. And it is extremely unlikely that we will ever get to the point of asking for photos or engaging in the initial interview process unless there is at least something of each of them in the public gallery to give us a taste of what they might be like to tempt us.
The assumption therefore is : Nothing of him in the public gallery= asume he is physically unattractive= move along (which is a shame because the lone girl was just gorgeous)
P & N xx
Recently we were flirted by a couple who made a big point in their profile that they would not consider anyone who approached them who DIDN'T have pics in their profile. Now they didn't say specifically that there had to be both male and female photos but I felt it was firmly implied.
What got up my nose was that these same people had ONE photo in their public gallery. A very hard to make out because the room was quite dark photo I think of a naked woman.
Now we have a picture of both of us as our front picture and our public gallery has a good selection of photos of both of us. Personally I think it is just rude to not have a photo of both of you and as a rule will pass over people who don't. I get the need for discretion but FFS there are ways of taking your face and any distinguishing tattoos etc out of a photo.
Otherwise I will assume the absent partner is either butt ugly, not on board or non existant.
Mrs Jones
sadly we have to agree..
when the pics are blurry and a long way away, or the guy/girl is missing...we hope they are just shy.
However over and over we get proved wrong.
We also have up front pics. Then if one of us is not your cup o tea..you dont waste your time messaging
:>
every time a person changes their profile pic...it changes the pic thats displayed on all their forum posts.... thats every single post they ever contributed . so its follows logically that the pic that mightve been showing when the conversation began...... might not be the ones that are seen when the conversation ends....ours change regularly, but its my face pic thats been shown the most, these past few months.......... Mike. (our pics are mainly of Shel...but we feel thats fine....shes the pretty one, and isnt it plain good sense to offer up the best pics you have, regardless of who the subject is?) heres a message we received just this week...and we dont really know whether to be insulted, or amused......Hey mike I say this respectfully: With that stunning women you have as a partner and those sexy pics of her - why don't you have one of those shots as your main one rather then your rough head?
so who do we please? and how do we do this....so those who disagree, dont feel left out? we alternate our pics.....and attempt to let people see both of us.......